Market landscape

Map the landscape before you bet on a direction

When you have no hypothesis yet, start with the map. Pull the conversations across a whole space and get a ranked overview of the segments, needs, and players that matter.

The problem

Starting research with no map means you anchor on the first thing you read and mistake it for the whole picture.

Analyst overviews are generic, paywalled, and written for everyone, so they rarely match the space you actually care about.

The real structure of a market — who the segments are, what they need, which tools they name — is implicit, spread across hundreds of unconnected threads.

How it works

  1. 1

    Describe the space

    Frame the market you want to understand as an open claim, no hypothesis required.

  2. 2

    Pull broadly

    We gather threads across the communities that make up the space, comments and all.

  3. 3

    AI clusters the signal

    Threads are tagged by the recurring need behind them and scored for how much each one matters.

  4. 4

    Read the overview

    A ranked report maps the segments and needs so you can see the whole board at once.

What the report looks like

With no hypothesis yet, the run clusters threads into the segments and recurring needs that make up a space, ranked by how often each one shows up.

SegmentTop needThreads
Solo foundersdistribution61
Agencieswhite-label reporting38
In-house teamstrust in the data24

Recurring needs across the whole space

  • Distribution / first customers
  • Trust in the data
  • Time to first insight
  • Price sensitivity around the $50 mark

Illustrative example

A representative run — not a measured result — to show the shape of the output.

“Map the Reddit-research tooling space — who is in it and what they need.”

Subreddits r/SaaS, r/marketing, r/EntrepreneurThreads ~230 classifiedCost ≈ $0.21Runtime ~13 min

The space splits cleanly into solo founders, agencies, and in-house teams, each with a distinct top need — while distribution and data-trust recur across all three.

Takeaway. You walk out with a map and three sharper claims to run next.

Why it works

Orientation, fast

Get the lay of the land in one run instead of weeks of scattered reading.

An unbiased starting point

Let the conversation define the map, rather than anchoring on the first article you found.

Segments and needs, mapped

See how the space breaks down and which needs recur, ranked by how often they come up.

A base for sharper claims

Use the overview to spin off focused claims — on a competitor, a trend, or an idea.

Under the hood

Structure from noise

Threads are clustered by the recurring need behind them, turning hundreds of posts into a readable map.

No hypothesis needed

Built for the “no commitment yet” case — describe the space and let the evidence draw the board.

A base for sharper runs

Spin any segment or need the map surfaces into a focused follow-up claim.

Frequently asked questions

When should I use this instead of competitor research?

Use this when you want the whole map of a space; use competitor research when you already know the players and want head-to-head sentiment.

Do I need a hypothesis to start?

No. This is built for the "no commitment yet" case — you describe the space and let the evidence draw the map.

What does the overview include?

The recurring segments and needs across the space, ranked by how often and how intensely they show up, with links to the source threads.

Can I drill down afterwards?

Yes. The landscape is a starting point — spin off a focused claim on any segment, need, or tool it surfaces.

How broad a space can I map?

As broad as a whole category or as narrow as a niche; wider spaces simply pull from more communities.

Validate what people actually say, not what you wish they would.